The Southtown Star has an article about the resignation of Chicago Ridge Fire Chief Robert Muszynski:
Citing “personal differences” with the village’s elected officials, Chicago Ridge Fire Chief Robert Muszynski has resigned over differences about changes the village is considering for the fire department. Muszynski’s resignation comes a few weeks after the village board encouraged Mayor Chuck Tokar to look at whether firefighter and/or ambulance service could be provided more efficiently. Now, firefighters say they’re worried about their jobs.
Changes could include hiring a private ambulance service, joining a fire protection district or adding a second ambulance at the former fire house at 107th Street and Lombard Avenue, Tokar said. Three older fire trucks are stored there and mainly used for training by paid-on-call firefighters, he said. The on-call firefighters sometimes are used when the village is busy with another call.
The main firehouse opened five years ago in an industrial park on Chicago Ridge’s west side, roughly two to three miles from the heart of the village’s residential area. Tokar and the board are concerned the distance may waste precious moments for ambulance calls that sometimes are answered by neighboring communities.
Adding a second ambulance would necessitate hiring up to eight more firefighters, Muszynski said.
That’s not in the cards in part because it would push the village’s annual pension levy upward of $1 million, Tokar countered. “We can’t afford to hire seven or eight to staff that 24/7. That’s way too expensive,” Tokar said.
When it became obvious that Muszynski would not budge, the board demanded his resignation through Tokar. The chief submitted his resignation letter Monday.
Firefighter/paramedic Christ Schmelzer, president of Chicago Ridge Professional Firefighters Local 3098, said “there’s a lot of tension in the firehouse.” “We basically fear for our jobs. No one has come over and told us to not worry. Everybody is running around scared,” he said.
Muszynski, 58, formerly of the Skokie and Schaumburg fire departments, was hired as chief in early 2011. Tokar said he was pleased with his performance as chief.
There’s no intention to lay off any full-time employees, Tokar said. Nevertheless, the fire department could be more efficient, he said. Ambulances from Alsip, Bridgeview, North Palos or Oak Lawn answer a large number of Chicago Ridge calls, he said. Another ambulance would keep more money in Chicago Ridge and help residents, he said. To slash costs the department could cut the number of firefighter/paramedics per call from two to one and stop sending a fire truck to every ambulance call, Tokar said.
In a June 4 interview, Schmelzer said there are 12 firefighter/paramedics and one lieutenant in the union, down from 17 a few years ago.
Local 3098 said in a letter that last year the fire department had 2,424 requests for service, with 1,599 of those for an ambulance. The department handled 87 percent of those calls, and outside agencies only were called in when they were busy on other calls, according to the letter.
The letter does say there are admittedly upsides to a protection district but urges all facets of any potential merger must be examined. Meanwhile, the village’s letter sent last week to residents hints that big changes are possible, saying they would “have no problem” with a fire department staffed by part-timers.
Both sides are in the midst of contract negotiations, which often can filled with heated exchanges and accusations.
The starting salary for firefighters is $45,000 Schmelzer said, but there’s been only one new hire in 10 years. Low staffing has forced overtime, and the village paid $45,000 in overtime over six weeks, Schmelzer said. The village said the highest base salary with benefits is more than $100,000 annually, counting overtime.
Tokar said he plans to talk with more fire department efficiency experts on ways to improve things in Chicago Ridge.
thanks Dieterich
Pingback: Oak Lawn fire chief to add Chicago Ridge to his duties « chicagoareafire.com
Pingback: Chicago Ridge fire chief resigns (more) « chicagoareafire.com
#1 by T. B. on July 3, 2014 - 10:32 AM
I think we all need to take a deep breath and look at the fact here. The bottom line is, the town did not fulfill their pension obligations and the firefighters are being the fall guys. I think there could be a very good discussion on union versus non-union, POP versus POC etc., as long as people don’t get defensive. My issue is, if a town is paying top salary to their full-time FF’s and the town next door is paying the same FF’s part-time wages without benefits, doesn’t that raise questions for the village administrators and boards of the full-time FF’s? My point is, this is going to eventually open the door for some serious issues. Happy Fourth!!!
#2 by 0.03 on July 2, 2014 - 7:01 PM
Dennis I would hope if you are a firefighter in the IAFF department and you scab with a contract service at another fire department that your own union throws you out of your local for conduct unbecoming a union member.
#3 by Dennis on July 2, 2014 - 6:43 PM
Jim, I know of plenty of part-time, & POC departments that have had to let me go because of cost’s.
#4 by Jim on July 2, 2014 - 2:53 PM
Max O,
When the economy was booming they could borrow money to complete projects and the tax money was always increasing because the housing prices were going up. Once the great recession hit, housing values plunged which decreased tax revenues. Their expenses however did not. Also during this time they were not making their proper pension contributions because they figured the interest would cover the difference because the stock market was also flying high. Now the pensions are underfunded and because of a new law they have to make the required contribution. They can’t raise taxes because they would loss the next election to someone promising to lower taxes. So the easiest thing to do is shed the biggest costs in most budgets, people.
#5 by Jim on July 2, 2014 - 2:45 PM
Dennis,
Where in my post did I say you shouldn’t do it? And I’m glad you assumed how I felt on most part time jobs in order to prove whatever point you wanted to make. I said its economics. Like if one Village is fulltime they must tax their taxpayer a certain amount plus a pension levy. If another Village is part time they will have a lesser tax rate and no pension levy. I would think most Villages would want to tax their taxpayers the least amount as possible in order to have businesses operating in their town. No if one Village is twice as much as the other, where would you go?
Also there are places laying off because of the cost. I’m sure if the cost went from $80,000 per year plus benefits for a firefighter to $40,000 a year and no benefits their would be no layoffs. So if you are willing to work part-time for that wage and get no benefits, why wouldn’t you do the same for the Village that is giving you benefits?
Doug,
I would like a source for your comment regarding you can’t hold two cards. And when you say what does the IAFF do for us, look in the mirror, you are the IAFF. What are you doing?
#6 by Dennis on July 2, 2014 - 2:12 PM
Doug, you can hold 2 union cards but they cant be in the same union. I.E. You can hold a IAFF card and a Electricians card.
0.03 if you think by not having guys work part time departments will force them to go full time then your way out in left field. So it’s ok for a Firefighter/paramedic to be full time on a fire department but not work part time for a private ambulance company who holds a contract for a local fire department. Or a department that can only offer a part time employment but only hire people who don’t work full time anywhere else? Guys working at part time departments has nothing to do with budget problems. A town who has 4 people working and try to compare to a different town with only 2 people is not the same thing. One town might be bigger then there other hence why they need more people on shift. Grow up and get off the scab high horse.
#7 by Max O on July 2, 2014 - 1:52 PM
Why do politicians constantly blame budget woes on Police and Fire departments?
#8 by doug on July 2, 2014 - 11:38 AM
this is to 0.03 was waiting for the scab part to come out hope you dont work a trade because you are a scab too, because last I checked you cant hold a card in two unions. Also what does our great iaff due for us except raise dues, god wish I could be union president and fly around to all the locals and have lunch with the troops, at least he looks good in his thousand dollar suits that we pay for.
#9 by 0.03 on July 2, 2014 - 9:52 AM
If you don’t think being a career firefighter working part time at another department isn’t detrimental then you are a fool. There are many departments that the unions in negotiations have had it thrown back in their faces that their guys are willing to work for less money and no benefits. Or why do they need 4 man staffing here when it’s ok to run with 2 at their part time job? We need to keep moving forward and making our job a profession not someone’s hobby. Besides there are departments that can and should be full time but because our guys go and scab there, it gives the employer no reason to move on it. Don’t forget about things like workmans comp, presumptive disabilities and other benefits the unions have fought for.
#10 by Dennis on July 1, 2014 - 11:26 PM
Jim, that’s not what I was saying but let me be more clear. if you are a IAFF union member you can not work for a part-time for another IAFF union. I understand and already said that guys who are career union firefighters do work for part time departments. There’s nothing wrong with that. Doing the same job for less money?? are you kidding me. If you and Chris both think that a union firefighter should not work a part time job then who else will work them. Also I guess it’s your opinion that they should not work any other job because most jobs are covered by any union at some point. It’s joke for you to sit here and belittle guys who are trying to feed there families because most towns and cities are cutting wages, benefits, and jobs
#11 by T on July 1, 2014 - 10:50 PM
So Jim, are you saying that McCook is going private. If so, with whom and what is happening to their ff’s. What is their union’s stance on it. I believe they are teamsters.
#12 by Jim on July 1, 2014 - 11:18 AM
Tom,
What is your definition of adequate? McCook is going from 3 full time per day to 3 contract personnel per day. To think Pleasantview was going to staff that firehouse is living in a fantasy world. I think many people feel they aren’t hurting anybody by working part time for another municipality while working full time at another but it is simple economics.
#13 by Tom Foley on July 1, 2014 - 1:26 AM
I did want to comment on McCook, since it was commented on.
This department is barely functional. No disrespect to the fine people in the department, but it’s one of the few departments without ALS service. Which, is mind boggling since there is so much industry in and around McCook.
If the town cannot and will not staff the department at adequate levels, they really should just let Pleasantview take over. In this case, it’s my opinion that the community would be better served.
#14 by Jim on June 30, 2014 - 10:11 PM
Dennis,
The Village of Summit is part time and is represented by the Teamsters. They have numerous IAFF full time firefighters working there part time. I think Chris is correct in his statement.
#15 by JS on June 30, 2014 - 5:50 PM
If only more people understood…long term, privatization ends up costing more – and it doesn’t guarantee a better service.
#16 by Dennis on June 30, 2014 - 5:15 PM
Well said Rudy, Most part time departments are not union of any kind so now reason that career guys cant work there. If a part time department is union (which there are some) then a career full time union firefighter CAN NOT nor will he/she be hired to work there. Chris your statement has no value.
#17 by MABAS21 on June 30, 2014 - 5:11 PM
I think everyone is off track on what Big Moe was trying to say here. It’s not about part-timers. I believe what he meant is, why are fire departments always the scapegoat with municipalities when it comes to pension shortfalls and budget cuts? Why do the elected officials always target us instead of police departments? How come part-time, consolidation or contract police services are never suggested? Not that I’m advocating those ideas here. It is mind boggling that beautification projects, land takeovers (through eminent domain) and other non important monetary issues supercede public safety when municipalities cry broke. Everyone here should follow the Chicago Ridge Firefighters Union Facebook page for updates and support our brothers, and also follow North Riverside, McCook and Oak Lawn on their how city father’s attempts on trying to disband those departments become similar to what happened in Dixmoor.
#18 by Rudy on June 30, 2014 - 2:57 PM
most career FF’s working at part time departments do so because those departments are either POC/POP , not full time departments that have cut full time jobs. Those departments usually go towards contract FF’s like Metro or PSI.
#19 by chris on June 30, 2014 - 12:26 AM
Because so many of our union brothers choose to work at part time depts.on the side And get the job done for less
#20 by Big Moe on June 29, 2014 - 9:21 PM
Where are all the suggestions for part-time or contracted police services? Why are we the weak link all the time?