The Essex Fire Department in Division 7 has been added to the site. A force of 18 volunteers runs 47 square miles out of one station in Kankakee County.
Archive for category Site News
web site updates (more)
May 15
More updates to the site:
MABAS Division 7:
- Herscher – Pilot Township FPD was added to the site
- Momence FPD: added their new Tanker 94
MABAS Division 12:
- Itasca: added the new medic unit and updated all the photos with new county numbering
MABAS Division 22: (this division is now complete on the site)
- Alsip: added the haz mat support unit at station2
- Blue Island was added to the site
- Calumet Park was added to the site
web site updates
May 14
The long overdue job of updating department profiles on the site has finally begun:
MABAS Division 1:
- Elk Grove Village: added Engine 8 and Quint 7
- Palatine: added Squad 85, Tower 85, and Ambulance 83
MABAS Division 3:
- Northfield: added Squad 29
- Highland Park: swapped Engine 34 and Squad 33
- Prospect Heights: added Squad 9
- Des Plaines: added Dive Unit 73
- Skokie: added Ambulance 16, Ambulance 17, refurbed Tower 16, refurbed Engine 17R, FPD 208, Utility 213,
- Wilmette: added Rescue 27 and Engine 27, updated the other photos
MABAS Division 4:
- Antioch: added Ambulance 211R and the rehab bus
- Grayslake: added Station 3
- Lake Villa: added Station 4 and hopefully unscrambled the ambulances
- Waukegan: added Truck 1634 and the department patch
Blue Island FD apparatus
Oct 1
Dennis McGuire, Jr. submitted images and information so that we can post the Blue Island FD to the site. Here is a preview:
- 2 stations
- Station 1: 2540 Vermont
- Station 2: Division St. & Canal St.
- 23 Full Time FFs
- 4 Part-Time FFs
- Covers: 4.16 Square miles
The Waukegan Fire Department has been added to the listings in MABAS Division 4. The last department in the county to be added is the largest. Waukegan has five stations with more than 28 pieces of rolling stock. All houses have an ALS rescue unit, and four run engine companies. Waukegan Station 4 staffs a 105′ Pierce quint alongside Rescue 1644.
Waukegan provides a bomb squad with containment vessel for Lake and McHenry Counties out of an annex building at Station 1. They also have a dive unit, haz mat unit, a large squad, and a 6×6 ARFF at the Waukegan Regional Airport.
They have Seagrave and KME engines, a Pierce and Seagrave aerial, plus Medtec, Wheeled Coach, and Taylor Made ambulances.
The second in a series of updates to the website:
The following departments have had apparatus images updated:
- Tinley Park – new quint
- Thornton – new engine
- Posen – new squad
- Winfield – partial new numbering
- West Chicago – new medic units and shifting of apparatus
- Carol Stream – Medic units and Battalion 28
- Chicago Rescue 1 at O’Hare – 2-7-8
- Stone Park – new ambulance
- Round Lake – station photos 1 & 2
- Huntley – station photos 1 & 2
- Oak Park – new ambulance
- Berwyn – new ambulance
- Hinsdale – new ambulance
- Broadview – squad added
- Downers Grove – new battalion buggy
- Cicero – new shift commander car and ambulance
- Schaumburg – updated ambulance and new engine
The first in a series of updates to the website:
The following departments have had apparatus images updated:
- Evanston Fire Department – all stations
- Skokie Fire Department – all stations
- Winnetka FIre Department – new & reserve ambulances
- Des Plaines Fire Department – Tower 83
- Niles Fire Department – Station 2
- Newport Township Fire District – new ambulance
- Lake Villa Fire District – new ambulance (sta 2)
- McHenry Township Fire Protection District – all stations
The Wonder Lake Fire Protection District in McHenry County has been added to the site . Information was provided by Karl Klotz, Steve Redick, and Larry Shapiro who photographed the stations and apparatus last week.
The district encompasses 11 square miles and has two stations. The main station is staffed around the clock and the outlying station only at night. Their rosters consists of 45 part-time firefighters and paramedics.
They have three ambulances, two engines, two 3,000-gallon commercial tankers, a heavy rescue, and a brush unit. They also have three boats of their own, plus they house a pair of MABAS Division 5 boats as well. One of their engines was previously part of the McHenry Township FPD.
It was four years ago today that the first post was added to this blog describing the Chicagoareafire.com web site. In the first month, seven entries were made in the blog describing the first fire departments that were uploaded to the site.
Here are a few stats from the fourth anniversary:
- 2775 entries have been posted to the blog
- 5760 comments have been made
- 182,000 spam comments have been stopped from clogging the comment section
- 200 fire departments and virtually the entire CFD have been uploaded
- the site has received more that 1,338,639 visits
- the site has been visited by more than 490,089 unique visitors
- visitors from 186 countries have viewed our content
- we have been visited by all 50 states and the District of Columbia
The staff would like to thank all of the contributors, photographers, and visitors for continually increasing the content and items of interest that have allowed the site to grow.
Thank you.
Note to blog users …
Apr 3
Posted by Admin in Site News | 10 Comments
It appears that the time has come to set some ground rules and discuss some policies for this blog.
We have a fairly strong readership, and many satisfied readers. We have a large group of responsible and dedicated contributors who are the backbone for the content found on this site.
So, let’s talk about making comments. An open forum is healthy. It can be both fun and informative. It can also be hurtful and vengeful. As the webmaster, some time ago I made the conscious decision to unlock the review period for those posting comments. It became too cumbersome to preview all posts prior to approving them, and it often introduced lengthy delays from when the comment was made and when it was posted.
Most comments are fine, but recently we’ve had some critiquing that went further than this blog may have ever intended to have happen. It’s an evolving process that requires periodic review.
Several readers have in the past tried to offer their interpretation of what this blog should be, by asking others to keep their critiques and criticisms to a minimum on this forum. As the webmaster, I try to remain neutral and let the forum run on it’s own.
I think that I speak (I’m presuming that I do) for the majority of readers when I say that we’d rather have the continued support and submissions from our regular contributors, than the occasional armchair quarterbacking from a small group of anonymous readers. In the years that this site has been up, I can probably count on one hand the number of comments that I’ve stopped from being posted due to what I felt was inappropriate. These comments came from totally anonymous sources. It’s not about censorship or free speech, both of which I am always conscious of, and I support. It’s about common courtesy and common sense.
We can’t blame the messenger for conveying something that may not be perfect, safe, according to NFPA, department protocol, or common sense. That responsibility belongs with the message itself. That being said, this is not our goal. We all understand that we live in a time where instant notification of events with images provides access to many where previously something may have only been seen by a few.
So, if you’ve got something to say, stop and think about it before you hit send. If you really feel strongly about an issue, then back it up by providing your name like so many of our readers do.
As the webmaster, I will take it upon myself in the future to withdraw something that may incite negativity that is not appropriate for this forum. It’s clearly a judgement call on my part, but that will be the direction for now. Again, the blog is a fluid environment that is constantly changing.
Should you wish to engage in critiquing the minutia found in an image, there is another very popular site which is largely dedicated to doing just that.
I welcome your comments and thoughts, and I thank you for visiting this site. Additionally, I wish to extend my apologies to those who bore the brunt of this insensitivity, as this was never the intent of this site.
Tags: Chicagoareafire.com policy, notice to blog users, posting comments