Excerpts from the ChicagoSunTimes.com:
Inspector General Joe Ferguson concluded the Chicago Fire Department hired only seven of the 32 civilians it agreed to hire to fill administrative jobs that have nothing to do with firefighting or emergency medical service.
The process of hiring civilians to fill nine other administrative jobs is in the works. It was slowed by legal impediments in the union contract and by the CFD’s claim that civilians can be hired only after uniformed members vacate those positions.
“CFD reported that it was not able to civilianize 15 of the 32 positions it had previously committed to converting because of the barrier to those cost and efficiency reforms potentially imposed by the recently expired” firefighters contract that remains in force, Ferguson said in a written follow-up to his original audit.
“As a result, CFD continues to employ trained firefighters in mail delivery positions, for example.”
Ferguson acknowledged what he called the potential constraints posed by a union contract that expired on June 30, but remains in effect until a new agreement is reached. But he urged Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration to seize the opportunity posed by collective bargaining to civilianize jobs that have nothing to do with firefighting or emergency service.
The inspector general pointed to the blueprint he gave the mayor nearly two months ago to renegotiate union contracts to cut costs and improve city services. Firefighters and paramedics would be impacted by those changes and Ferguson’s renewed request to take a fresh look at the minimum-manning requirement that triggered the bitter 1980 firefighters strike.
Ferguson also recommended that Emanuel rein in side-letters that tie the city’s hands. There are 51 side letters in the firefighters contract and 42 more in the police contract.
“The city and its union partners have a generational opportunity to right-size labor contracts to reflect contemporary operations,” Ferguson wrote, noting that public safety takes up more than half the city’s workforce and operating budget.
Eighteen months ago, Ferguson concluded the fire department could save at least $1.2 million a year and potentially millions more in overtime by hiring civilians to perform 34 administrative jobs that have nothing to do with firefighting or emergency medical service.
After analyzing the duties and responsibilities of 555 uniformed firefighters and paramedics within the $576.7 million-a-year fire department bureaucracy, he recommended that Chicago hire civilians to perform 34 of those jobs and eliminate the job of commissary liaison altogether.
That would save Chicago taxpayers at least $1.2 million a year, cut fire department overtime that topped $50 million last year, improve public safety and reduce response times, Ferguson said.
Two firefighters whose jobs were targeted for civilians actually served as mail carriers, though their jobs were “not always documented in position descriptions or titles,” the inspector general concluded. The others were assigned to administrative duties, such as making certain fire department scheduling complies with minimum staffing requirements mandated by the firefighters contract.
The city makes a “substantial investment” in training firefighters and paramedics, Ferguson said then, but “does not make the most effective and efficient use of that specialized, taxpayer-subsidized training and expertise when it assigns a segment of its skilled ranks to administrative functions that could be performed by civilians.”
At the time, the Fire Department embraced Ferguson’s recommendation on 32 of the 35 targeted positions. Commissioner Jose Santiago further agreed to follow the recommendation to “assess all positions … and ensure that job descriptions reflect actual responsibilities of uniformed positions.”
Such a periodic review could save even more money, but only if Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2 goes along.
In Thursday’s follow-up audit, the Fire Department stated that regular reviews have identified no other jobs that could be performed by civilians. But the department acknowledged the review process was informal and not documented and that more formal reviews may be warranted.
During the January 2016 audit, the fire department tried to get a head start hiring civilians for some jobs including the two mail delivery positions. But Local 2 filed a grievance, saying the job had been in the union for decades and demanding that it stay there.
thanks Dan
#1 by John Antkowski on July 20, 2017 - 1:36 PM
Mike sounds like the handwriting is on the wall. 35 companies run short. How many people get hired overtime?John
#2 by Mike on July 19, 2017 - 8:08 AM
Hi bill thanks for clarifying this. I am trying to remember where the 6th man came from. Maybe NFPA 1710. There was talk about the downtown companies needing a 6th man because the hi rise stills. Honestly I would be surprised if they lose the 5th man. If the go to all 4 man companies there will be a need for additional resources on stills and it would cause a ripple affect and actually increase company responses. Their SOG’s and GO’s for foreground ops are written around 5 man staffing.
#3 by Bill Post on July 19, 2017 - 12:58 AM
Mike you had mentioned in your last comment about the Tri Data Study of the late 90’s and the “6th man”. The Tri Data study as far as I know didn’t really recommend adding a 6th man to any of the companies (with the exception of the Squads which already were 6 man companies. The Tri Data study did recommend keeping 5 men on the Trucks and it did take a look at the possibility of running with 4 man Engines but ultimately they said it was up to the fire departments management. The Maatman Reports of the late 60s and early 70’s are the studies that had recommended that Chicago go to 4 man companies for the companies that weren’t very busy and they would be followed by 6 man Flying Manpower Squads while the busy companies and the downtown companies would remain with 5 men assigned to them. That was only recommended however when Chicago had given the Firefighters in 1967 and extra day off but at the same time the city had refused to hire more firefighters to make up for the reduced hours so the 1968 Maatman report had recommended the 4 man companies.
For historical purposes the Original Maatman 1964 Report did recommend adding a 6th man to just a few Engines and Trucks while most of the others would remain as 5 man companies. The study however was from 53 years ago.
I am not advocating going to 4 man companies and I only brought this up for historical purposes. To this day New York City does normally run it’s Truck companies with 6 men assigned to them and some of their Engines will run with 6 men however that is New York City.
#4 by Mike on July 18, 2017 - 10:15 PM
A variance is when a fire company: engine, truck or tower goes from 5 to 4 for a 24 hour period. Anything openings over the 35 causes a rehire. Most companies have 7 people assigned to them and because of the Daley day fourlough schedule guys vacate their spot. So someone in upper management decides which companies are on variance and when guys get rehired what company they go to to fill in.
In short the variance allows the city 35 passes a day to run 4 person companies.
#5 by John Antkowski on July 18, 2017 - 8:53 PM
Can anyone tell me what a variance is? Is it like vacancies? In Milwaukee all daily staffing is filled with special duty overtime. Right now because of vacations sick and injury leave the MFD is hiring between 30 to 40 firefighters a day and with our 27 day cycle some are up to time and a half Status. There have been days when our members have been mandated to work because of limited volunteers. There’s a class going on now so we’ll see how it adjusts. John
#6 by Wayne on July 18, 2017 - 8:17 PM
Just because you CAN run with 4 doesn’t mean you SHOULD.
#7 by Mike on July 18, 2017 - 4:39 PM
Mike Mc the variances don’t work. You either lose a guy going to the rear on the truck or you lose the heal man on the engine. The city is cheating because they’re also using either the engineer or officer as the medic or second EMT on rigs also. There was and has been talk about adding an additional engine or truck to still because of variances because there have been times when a still comes in and several still companies are on variances. Also if this was a good idea they would do it to single company houses also and they are not. The political climate in Chicago is awful and with a new union president it will be interesting to see how things go. Regarding the 6th man that was in the tri data study back in the 90’s.
#8 by John Antkowski on July 18, 2017 - 3:47 PM
Yes Mike I agree I can count on my hands that we a good 4 or 5 firehouses that should be closed out right. The new firehouse built for the now cut engine 35 is garbage engines 34, 7 and I believe engine 26 has the apparatus floors failing. Our Chief wants water back in every house. All the single Truck houses are a joke. like you say Engine 11 that used to be in bay view area has no engine just Truck 6. And Engine 5 that was cut now only has a Med unit and a Chief. Is also a joke. Point well taken, Mike we still have a great pension solvent and doing quite well. I heard that the pensioners in Chicago and Illinois are losing benefits and paying horrible co-pays and deductibles. I have been following the politics with local 2 and the city and I don’t think that they will be able to keep the minimum staffing standards. Times are tough and bottom line is the city writes the budget and if it comes in 5 to 10 million lower than the previous year you take a hard look on what is more important keep up the staffing or bargain for better benefits and possibly 2 to 4% wage increases. You have to wonder. We don’t get half the amount of fires that Chicago gets so it’s hard to bargain on fire safety when the numbers aren’t there. We have had a rise in fire fatalities in the inner city so we’ll see how our budget ends up. Take care John
#9 by mike mc on July 18, 2017 - 1:53 PM
With all due respect Mike, the variances are positive proof that the city can get along quite safely with four member companies. You know as well as I do the engine and truck don’t always respond together and even when they do, they operate independently. It’s not like an LA City task force. Every single day, 35 companies are proving that it can be done. The mayor backed down last time because of threats of exposing TIFs. He won’t make the same mistake again. Six member companies? You’re talking Dennis Smith, Bronx, 1970s war years my friend. I agree they have fallen way behind in apparatus replacement but let’s face it, the city is not financially solvent.
John: Your pension will be secure when Chicago is declaring bankruptcy in the not too distant future. Quints are inevitable because you have too many single truck houses. Truck 11, for example, is absurdly isolated to be a lone truck house. The only bad thing I can say about MFD is they should have the courage to close firehouses and not keep them open as shells to fool the public. Engine 5 ‘s house with a chief and a medic company and not one fire company? Silly. Engine 1 is valuable real estate the city can sell. MFD went in the wrong direction building those large, multi-bay stations in the 1990’s and early 2000’s. They will only need stations half that size in the future.
#10 by Mike on July 18, 2017 - 10:44 AM
They already have 35 variances a day where in double houses they drop a company to 4. The problem is the south and west side are going to fires and need 5 man companies and downtown with all the hi rises they should actually have a 6th man. So if you take it from the slow areas what happens when extra alarms come in and those slower under manned companies move into those areas of the city? The city has money it is just a matter of what they deem is important to them. Letting the firemen ride in 20 year old rusted out crap that is constantly breaking down or giving the mayors pals tax breaks to build property. Don’t let the BS and rhetoric fool you.
#11 by John Antkowski on July 18, 2017 - 9:43 AM
I hope that the Chicago firefighters union plays the recent advance by the city to privatize jobs easy. With an expired contract and minimum staffing in the talk I would tread lightly. NFPA only requires four on Fire apparatus and Chicago has been running with five. I these tough times a lot of cities are slashing fire department budgets. In Milwaukee our mayor asked for 75 firefighter positions and have reopened the thought of quints so local 2 pick your fights well. John