WBEZ radio has an updated article about Chicago’s Red-X program for labeling dangerous buildings:
Earlier this year, Curious City reported on a small symbol with a big impact on Chicago’s built environment. Now we’ve got an update.
In June we brought you the story of Chicago’s red “X” — sturdy, metal signs that the Chicago Fire Department affixed to 1,804 vacant properties between June 2012 and July 2013. Not every vacant building received a sign, just those that could pose a hazard to firefighters and other first responders in the event of an emergency there.
Since our story ran in June, several city officials have said they wanted to see the program continue. Ald. Debra Silverstein, who sponsored the original red “X” ordinance, told us she wanted to find more money for the program. At least since WBEZ first reported that the program had run out of money, Chicago Fire Department spokesman Larry Langford says they’ve been hunting “anywhere [they] can” for more grant funding. But now the department talks about the program in the past tense. “We have not seen where any such money is readily available,” says Langford. “We did not get new funding and expanded the electronic side of the system to continue the awareness for first responders.”
Langford says the electronic system works like this: When dispatch is alerted of a fire at a specific address, they pull up information on that location using the OEMC database. Firefighters print out that information before they leave the firehouse, but it will also appear on firefighters’ mobile terminals on site — in red letters. So from the firefighter’s perspective, Langford says, the electronic information communicates the same information as the red “X” was designed to provide.
The electronic alert system is not dependent on grants, unlike the red “X” program, which was funded through a $675,000 award from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
… Langford says, the electronic database is enough. “The OEMC system allows us to achieve the goal of protecting firefighters,” Langford says, “without having to mark buildings.”
And just like the red “X” signs, the information communicated by the OEMC system isn’t meant to rule out entry for first responders, just to advise caution in certain circumstances.
thanks Dannis
#1 by Dennis on October 18, 2014 - 8:25 AM
Also to Langford’s statement of ” the electronic database is enough. “The OEMC system allows us to achieve the goal of protecting firefighters,” Langford says, “without having to mark buildings.” ” is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Human error can just miss one building from being entered into the database and that one building could cause us to loss another firefighter. I have been on runs were the building is Red X’d but the alarm office had no idea. A red X building gets a special response. Also If someone is calling in the address to a fire but is giving the address wrong then the ” database” will not identify it as a Red X building. I like having the signs because then I know to be extra cautious but the bad side of this program is most guys will get used to the signs but when they enter a building that doesn’t have the sign their guard might lower and they wont be so aware of problems with the building.
#2 by Dennis on October 18, 2014 - 8:18 AM
Lets not forget it was not just 1 firefighter killed it was 2. RIP Corey Ankum and Ed Stringer.