The Riverside-Brookfiled Landmark has an article about this week’s village board meeting in North Riverside;
North Riverside’s village board on Monday night was confronted with a sea of orange and a strong display of solidarity toward firefighters, who are battling against a plan to privatize the department and shift the village fire service to the company that now provides its paramedics.
For the second straight week, about 150 people packed the Village Commons council chamber to overflowing. The vast majority, many of them North Riverside firefighters and union [members] from other municipalities, wore orange T-shirts bearing the crest of North Riverside Firefighters Local 2714.
“Your radical idea to balance your budget [after] years of misappropriation and mismanagement of town funds, does not give you the right to bargain with our safety,” said Chris Kribales, a North Riverside firefighter and resident of the village for more than a decade. “This town deserves professional, sworn people to protect them.”
Monday’s meeting was the legally required public hearing for the village’s 2014-15 appropriations ordinance, which must be passed by the end of July. The village board is scheduled to meet at a special session on Thursday, July 24, to pass the ordinance, which guides spending for the current fiscal year, which began May 1.
The appropriations ordinance drafted by village officials calls for a savings in fire department spending of more than $700,000. Mayor Hubert Hermanek Jr. has proposed deriving that savings by contracting out fire protection services to Paramedic Services of Illinois (PSI), which has provided paramedics to North Riverside for 28 years.
Firefighters have been offered a chance to sign on with PSI at their current salaries, but they would lose benefits such as their pensions and health care in favor of benefits provided by PSI.
Hermanek has identified the steep cost of firefighter pensions as the reason the village needs to change the way the fire department operates. The village has failed over the past decade to fund its fire and police pensions adequately, and now faces sanctions from the state of Illinois unless it does so.
Firefighters and their supporters say the village is scapegoating firefighters for financial problems it built for itself over more than two decades, including a failure to raise the village’s property tax levy, village subsidies for water and waste hauling services, and generous salaries and benefits for village employees and elected officials.
North Riverside firefighters have been working without a contract since April 30. The village and the union have had two negotiating sessions so far. A third is scheduled for July 21, just prior to the vote on the fiscal-year appropriation.
Firefighter Rick Urbinati, who also made a public statement at Monday’s hearing, said he believed the two sides could negotiate an agreement that would save the union structure and find the savings the village is looking for. “This union’s been here since 1979 and it’ll stay here.”
The attorney for the firefighters union has said previously that the union would sue the village if it attempted to privatize the department.
Several supporters of the union who spoke Monday said they would be happy to pay more in taxes to ensure that the village’s fire department remained as is. Others cautioned that privatizing fire protection was risky and would be susceptible to constant turnover. Of the 18 speakers, Monday, 13 were strong supporters of the firefighters’ position. Only a handful warned that the village’s pension burden would drive North Riverside’s finances into the ground.
“Pension costs for village employees are eating us alive,” said Al Meyer, who supports the village’s proposed solution to the pension issue. “Our village leaders have stepped up with an innovative plan to address this problem. Continue negotiations with the fire union to cut expenses. And if that fails, privatize the fire department.”
thanks Dan
Pingback: North Riverside considers privatizing FD (more) « chicagoareafire.com
#1 by Wayne on July 19, 2014 - 12:21 AM
The issue isn’t who’s sworn and/or union and who isn’t. There’s plenty of fire departments (not in the suburbia surrounding Chicago) that hire “civilian” paramedics as single role providers. There’s an entire county in Indiana (LaPorte) that is covered by a county-run EMS service and they aren’t sworn or union. They keep people for their entire careers because they have great benefits and focus on actual patient care, have nice equipment, and the bosses treat the medics like humans. In Illinois, not terribly far from where this controversy is going down, there’s a hospital run ambulance that covers most of a county, the employees of which are not sworn or union (Riverside Hospital) These places all have paramedics that would put some sworn/union paramedics to shame with their professionalism and patient care abilities. The issue is benefits and how the actual employer treats their people. Places that value their employees (the contract companies in IL are not these places) and provide solid benefits KEEP GOOD PEOPLE regardless of their union/”sworn” status. Contract medics and/or firefighters are just as capable of providing quality care and fighting fires as their unionized/sworn counterparts. Lots of people get stuck at privates/contract companies for reasons that have nothing to do with their ability to perform the jobs. The focus shouldn’t be on meaningless details such as what cards one has in their wallet and what oaths one has taken. The focus should be on actual, concrete details of why these companies are not good for the town.
#2 by DMc77 on July 18, 2014 - 9:37 PM
Tom – if you think the current firefighters at NRIV are going to be able to keep the same level of salary and benefits as they currently have, you are mistaken. They may receive pay/benefits comparable to what they have now starting out, but in a matter of a few years their compensation will reduce dramatically. There is no way a private company can stay profitable by keeping their salaries comaprable to other fire departments.
As for the residents of North Riverside deserving sworn, professional personnel, private emergency service conpanies experience continual turnover of personnel. Their employees are usually younger, and testing around to obtain a spot on a municipal fire department. Aspiring firefighter/paramedics don’t enter employment with a private fire department contract with the intention of staying there for 30 years. The pay, benefits, sick/vacation time and retirement benefits simply don’t equal out to what municipal fire department employees get, or other people in other industries. If privatization was that great a deal for people, we would all be doing it. I know because I’ve been there.
As far as the NRIV ambulances being staffed with contract medics, its not as easy as the union telling the department they want to take over the ambulances. NRIV would have to hire a minimum of 6 more employees to staff the ambulances, and probably up to 9 more to cover sick/vacation days, injuries, etc. Its just not that easy.
#3 by 0.03 on July 18, 2014 - 9:07 PM
Giving and trusting a private and for profit company for emergency services is just wrong. There are a lot of issues with private companies. How they hire, the employees themselves, most contract employees can’t get hired as a certificated firefighter because of multiple reasons. By privatizing the taxpayer really doesn’t have a say in how they want their department run and the accountability issues arise. Lastly wen the profits are gone so is the for profit company.
#4 by Jim on July 18, 2014 - 8:12 PM
How about savings that will help fund them? I think a consolidation of fire departments is coming. Gone will be the days of every municipality having their own firehouse. Going private is not the answer, its only a band aid.
And if we compare this to the private sector, the business would be sued for fraud for not funding the pensions.
#5 by Tom Foley on July 18, 2014 - 7:44 PM
I think the argument, “this town deserves professional, sworn people to protect them” is a weak one considering the option on the table is to offer each firefighter a job with the same pay, but with benefits from PSI.
Is the suggestion that the same firefighters would not be professional or protect the public if they worked for PSI? Again, weak argument, because I wouldn’t believe that to be the case for a second.
North Riverside was very wrong in their handling of pensions. It’s hard to have to put the firefighters in the middle of this. However, the firefighters are still being offered their jobs at the same salary with some sort of benefits.
When re-organization and re-structuring happens in the private sector, it rarely has turns out as good as the offer on the table.
Regardless of the North Riverside handling of pensions, there is a crisis in many municipalities and the state of Illinois with pensions. They are too costly and in some cases, sweet deals were made that cannot be paid for.
The most effective argument the union can present is a solution to pension problems.
#6 by Jim on July 18, 2014 - 6:34 PM
Rick,
Who said they are not medics?
#7 by Rick on July 18, 2014 - 3:42 PM
Hey Chris if they deserve professional sworn people to protect them how come you guys are not medics? Don’t see a lot of fire in North Riverside do you but I bet there is a lot of ambulance calls.