Excerpts from the New Lenox FPD website:
On March 19th, the New Lenox Fire Protection District Board of Trustees voted to secure a $750,000 Tax Anticipation Warrant to cover the district’s budget deficit. This extra funding will fill the gap between when the district runs out of funds in April and when the next tax revenues are received in June.
Due to the lack of revenue with no sources for new funding, the NLFPD had to make some difficult decisions to keep the district running at a lower cost. To do this, residents will be seeing cuts over the next week to facilities, personnel, and services.
On Friday, March 30th, Station 2, at 1205 N. Cedar Road will be closing its doors until further notice due to a reduction in firefighter/paramedic positions. The district will be cutting 4 positions per shift, which includes both part-time and full-time personnel. Earlier this year, cuts also took place in administration after one employee left, leaving an open position which will not be filled. Other programs that involve using shift personnel and apparatus for long periods of time will also be reduced or eliminated.
The NLFPD has tried to pass referendums to increase the tax rate five times over the past 12 years (2006, 2009, 2011, 2014, and March 2018), knowing this day would eventually come. During this time, the district has cut back on spending and was able to tighten their belts to keep the current situation at bay, but the district can no longer afford to operate at less than half of the budgets of neighboring towns, while giving the same services.
“The residents voted, and without having an end in sight, we had to make the best decisions for our bottom line, and unfortunately, this was our only option,” stated Deputy Chief Dan Turner. “If the NLFPD does not pass a referendum soon to increase our funding, further cuts will happen. Without any additional funding coming our way we will need to keep borrowing money from future taxes and eventually we would owe more than we bring in.”
Excerpts from the ChicagoTribune.com:
Following the defeat of a fifth referendum for a tax rate increase, New Lenox Fire Protection District officials said their only option is to close one of its four fire stations and cut staff.
Station No. 2, which opened in 1970 at 1205 N. Cedar Road, will close Friday until further notice, and result in the reduction of four firefighter/paramedic positions. The district expects to save between $640,000 and $660,000 per year by closing the station.
The fire district board of trustees also voted at its March 19 meeting to issue $750,000 in Tax Anticipation Warrants to cover the district’s budget deficit. This extra funding will fill the gap between April, when the district runs out of funds and June, when property tax revenues are received.
Nearly all of the district’s revenues comes from property taxes. The current levy is $4.7 million. Other funds come from grants, insurance payments for ambulance service, donations, false alarm fines, and construction plan reviews. Grants and donations provide money for special equipment.
In the March primary, a referendum to increase the fire district’s tax rate from 38 cents to 59 cents per $100 of equalized assessed valuation was defeated by 212 votes. They will try again for a rate hike in November.
The New Lenox Fire Protection District has not had a tax rate increase since 1989, but has tried to pass referendums five times over the past 12 years, in 2006, 2009, 2011, 2014 and March 2018. Since 1989, the population has more than doubled from 16,574 to 42,172 and the number of commercial and industrial buildings also has grown significantly, resulting in an increase in calls, from 890 in 1990, to 4,252 in 2017.
New Lenox Fire Protection District’s 38 cents is the lowest tax rate in the area. It is second to the Frankfort Fire Protection District, with a rate of 80 cents, which generates a levy of $10.6 million. Frankfort had 4,377 calls in 2017.
thanks Dan and Keith
Pingback: New Lenox Fire Protection District news (more) « chicagoareafire.com
Pingback: new Lenox Fire Protection District news (more) « chicagoareafire.com
#1 by Wayne on April 3, 2018 - 7:53 PM
Fire territories work in Indiana because they have the legal framework to form them. To my understanding they do not have “Districts” as we have them, where a separate government agency is formed and they tax and whatnot. I’m not sure of the intricacies of taxing as a territory, but a territory is formed by multiple government agencies signing something like an intergovernmental agreement and essentially merging their fire departments. I believe they all still levy taxes separately, and then use the combined income to run a single fire department. Each governmental body gets representation in their version of “Trustees” or “Commission.” Valparaiso, Merrillville, and Crown Point are examples of territories. They cover the city in the name, as well as unincorporated areas around them. The agencies that form the territory would be, for example, Merrillville and Ross Township. Merrillville, up until recently, even used Ross Township on some of their rigs as they were purchased with Township money.
#2 by Jim on April 3, 2018 - 1:07 PM
Does anyone know how many full time personnel and how many contract personnel?
#3 by LT501 on April 2, 2018 - 2:23 PM
I think Indiana may have an idea worth looking into. It appears that more and more of their fire departments and fire districts are consolidating into “fire territories”. I don’t know the exact benefits, but I have heard that it gives the districts alot more leverage on their taxing ability and subsequent financial control. The former Clay Twp.Fire Dept (North of South Bend) took over the financially struggling German and Harris Twp. fire dept’s several years ago and became the Clay Fire Territory. Recently they purchased 4 new E-one engines, 1 one rescue pumper, and two medium duty ALS ambulances to service their combined twp stations (5 in all)…as well as adding additional staffing. So whatever financial issues they may have inherited, becoming a “fire territory” certainly appears to have worked out well for them.
#4 by Mike on April 2, 2018 - 10:23 AM
Jim, still a lot more than just the wages. Rising costs of health insurance. I believe they opened additional firehouses and staffed them due to the growth in the district. The bottom line is yes their budget increased as the EAV went up but they always kept the rate the same as it was in 1989. How many people today are living on a 1989 budget.
#5 by Jim on April 2, 2018 - 9:10 AM
Mike I agree everything has gone up including labor but labor costs can’t outpace the money coming in. Usually labor is a majority of any budget so I would think management and labor would need to get together. While I understand how comparable play a roll on pay and benefits, the money coming in has to play a bigger role. The tax rate is only one component of the tax money brought in. EAV is the other.
#6 by Michael m on March 31, 2018 - 1:38 PM
What will happen with the Engine from that station? It is a new engine I believe the purchased within the last year. Will it be re-assigned to a different station? My guess is it will be re-assigned. I would hate for them to have to sell it.
#7 by Mike on March 31, 2018 - 12:43 PM
So here is little more about what’s going on. The district has been using the same levy since 1989. The amount collected has gone up because of the growth in the district but they have still be only levying 39 cents for every hundred dollars of value in the district. During the last 29 years everything has gone up tremendously: labor, insurance, apparatus supplies. All while run volume has increased also. How many of you are making the same money today as you were in 1989? The problem is all the taxing bodies in Illinois always wanting more. The consolidation thought is good but for New Lenox isn’t going to work. Their area is to big and consolidating with say mokena isn’t going to cause a reduction in houses or staff. Yes you would have 1 chief but that’s about it for a savings. Maybe we need to work on consolidating other areas of government and figure out how Fire districts can get part of motor fuel tax or sales tax to help ease the burden on homeowners. When a firehouse closed its usually followed by something bad. Lake Zurich had this happen a few years ago when they did rolling brownouts. It sucks to have a fire and have your first in company closed and second due company, who is now first, 12 minutes away.
#8 by Jim on March 31, 2018 - 9:34 AM
LT 501,
It goes beyond just the chiefs. Firehouses can be reduced but put into better locations. Spare apparatus can be reduced. Unmanned apparatus shouldn’t be bought (ie north riverside tower ladder). Equipment that isn’t used shouldn’t be bought. The grant process has been keeping the golden goose going for a while. Department get a grant for SCBAs and purchase 4 times the amount they need or have on shift. For what? For their spare apparatus. Everybody buys custom rigs. If you replace them on a regular basis, why do you need custom? Look at the firehouses that some communities build. Why does one community build a 10 million dollar firehouse while another builds a 3 million dollar firehouse.
#9 by LT501 on March 31, 2018 - 1:36 AM
The best solution to the funding issue in today’s fire service, particularly in the Chicago suburbs, is “consolidation”. Too many communities are served by dept’s/dist’s that have only one or two stations…yet they still maintain their own Fire Chief, DC and 3 BC’s/Shift Commanders. Why? Our Incident Command training has shown us that a manageable span of control is between 3 & 7. Therefore, each BC/SC should have between 3 to 7 Lt’s reporting to him, or he/she is being under-utilized. Look at CFD. Each day, you have 24 BC’s supervising approx.100 fire stations comprising around 170 active fire companies (not including ambulances). That is between a 1:4 to 1:7 ratio. Obviously, no suburban Fire Chief wants to hear that the fire service can survive effectively within our area with at least 70% less “white shirts”, but when you look at their high salaries and do the math…how can we not consider it ? Take MABAS 21 for example. Eleven individual dept’s/dist’s possessing 21 stations. If they were to consolidate into 4 MABAS “sub-divisions”, they would have 1 Fire Chief, DC and BC (x 3 shifts) overseeing 5 to 6 stations. Far more efficient…and far less costly. However, what fire chief in his right mind would choose to eliminate his own position or those of his support staff…not to mention the politics of each community having its very own fire dept. Hence, the trend to lay-off the “blue shirt” FF’s and delay the purchase of needed equipment…all of which negatively impact the communities involved. Perhaps the real issue can be best summarized by the old saying, “too many Chiefs…not enough Indians”.
#10 by harry on March 30, 2018 - 10:34 PM
mabas 21 well to answer your question would I want to ride in an uncomfortable ambulance the question is no but at the same time franklin park runs almost 4000 calls a year running 1 engine 1 ladder 2 ambulances and a bc and ambos have issues but a1 is a 15 2 is a 09 and 3 is an 08 and they are fine however for us hospitals are closer I think
#11 by MABAS21 on March 30, 2018 - 8:35 PM
Harry,
In urban areas, ambulances receive heavy abuse and generally last 6-8 years frontline because wear and tear will gradually skyrocket maintenance costs. Electrical systems begin to start having issues. HVAC systems become less efficient. They graduually loose horsepower and the vehicle’s acceleration slows down. Their suspension components wear and effect the vehicle’s smooth ride. Would you like to be a seriously injured or ill patient riding in an old, extremely bumpy ambulance with little to no comfort so you become car sick? Or would you want paramedics starting an IV or intubating you in that same bumpy ambulance?
Engines generally last up to 15 years frontline because of the same reasoning. Besides corrosion issues, electrical and HVAC systems, drivetrain, pumping capacities and general handling start losing their efficiency within time. As you know, things are not made to last. Improved technology and safety features improve to benefit us and keep us safe.
Also we’re doing more with less. Many departments are replacing 2 or more apparatus with one to perform multiple funtions because of staffing issues being drastically decreased or are just being fiscally responsible with decreasing their fleet sizes.
Purchasing used police cars is not a good idea either. In this time of public safety being scrutinized with spending, wise decisions need to be made. A used police car usually has very high mileage and is simply beat to hell because of the nature of the job. Interiors are destroyed, electrical systems were overused and tired, motors have excessive idling hours. Warranties are expired and so on. Why would you want to take on another departments maintenance nightmare?
So look at the big picture Harry. The times have definitely changed and the roles and responsibilities of the fire service have increased. We’re doing more with less. It’s beneficial and fiscally responsible to have a vehicle replacement program to provide the residents we serve with the best, most efficient service with their hard earned tax dollars that they expect.
#12 by Jim on March 30, 2018 - 7:57 PM
Sounds like they didn’t make sound financial decisions. I think at times everyone gets greedy. Unfortunately you can only spend what you bring in. This goes for fire apparatus as well as salaries. Has the district went to the union for concessions? Are they looking at stock apparatus rather than custom? Are they buying only what they need? Look at a lot of departments and their spare apparatus are fully outfitted? Why? Are firehouses in the best locations to serve the district? We like to compare different department and districts but many times their tax bases aren’t the same so they can’t be expected to be the same. I don’t live in New Lenox but this problem is not exclusive to New Lenox.
#13 by Mike on March 30, 2018 - 7:43 PM
Bill you have to look at the big picture. How big is their response district compared to the entity you are talking about? North Maine runs almost 4,000 runs out of 1 house with an engine and ambulance but their district is like 5 square miles. I think New Lenox is like 30. That m and longer response times.
#14 by harry on March 30, 2018 - 4:57 PM
well wayne I honestly don’t know what there oldest engines are but when I was there in 2015 they had a 99 ihc they bought used to use as a backup for 62 but then the other 4 were 2 06 and 2 2010 also many fd use old police cars as fd cars that is good money management because for franklin pk fd for instance the fire chief has a used ex Massachusetts pd explorer got it with 54 000 miles on it got it for a few thousand dollars that is what I call smart because in the almost year he has had it I bet he has not put more than 1000 miles on it
and rob u are correct I do not work with any municipal agency but I observe a lot new lenox got the 2 fpb Silverado 1500 pu to replace the totaled cars I assume but was it a smart choice to get it with the painted front grill and bumper I see they could have done base model front like the public works does because if I recall the fc and bc chief both got 15 tahoes then didn’t the fc get a 16 Tahoe later correct me if I am wrong see I have no problem with a fd pd or pw getting new equipment but quite honestly a fire engine or truck can last 25 or 30 years I can think of at least 10 towns that have a rig 20 or 30 years old heck fdny has 98 engines still in reserve or spares take Rosemont for example they have an 87 Spartan engine niles il a 92 pierce
#15 by Bill on March 30, 2018 - 4:14 PM
They can’t run 4200 calls out of 3 stations? There are departments running 4850 out of 2 stations, with 2 medic units and 2 fire companies, and 10 guys on duty. It sucks to not get a referendum, but figure it out, we are all doing more with less.
#16 by Austin on March 30, 2018 - 3:30 PM
I went to the MABAS map on this site, and took a look at their apparatus that is listed. I know it is old info, but for this argument it is telling. A lot seems to be at or past its useful life. Just as a casual observer, with no connection to the town, I think they needed new apparatus. Every town can run into problems with finance, especially when you can’t get a tax increase. Costs keep climbing, and new apparatus and equipment need to be replaced. Like I said, I’m just a casual observer to this district, but my guess is everything sadly caught up to them and now they are screwed.
#17 by Rob on March 30, 2018 - 12:48 PM
Harry, first of all. You are not a firefighter, police officer, government official, or resident of New Lenox. You have no right to say what needs to be replaced and what doesn’t. I’ll tell you this much. All the equipment purchased the last few years replaced some worn-out equipment. I’m sorry to call you out but you need to calm down on some of these posts because a lot of people read the posts…
This is an ongoing issue that needs to be resolved before public safety is in jeopardy. Not only in New Lenox but across the state and even country. Get it figured out before understaffing becomes a norm.
#18 by Wayne on March 29, 2018 - 11:38 PM
How do you know those ambulances weren’t necessary? How do you know that the new engine wasn’t necessary? Why should the fire department get second hand police cars? I don’t know a lot of specifics about NLFPD but the things you cite here don’t necessarily constitute waste on their own.
#19 by harry on March 29, 2018 - 9:14 PM
just a thought maybe if they would stop wasteing money on new vehicles like 2 or 3 new ambulances over the last 3 years or so at least 1 engine in that time and a plow truck mechanic truck 2 Silverado 1500 pu for fpb vehicles and at least several tahoes is that normal or perhaps if they were part of the village and not a fire dist they would have more money because police cars could then be passed down for dept cars