Excerpts from the Bettergov.org:
A rope hung in a firefighter union official’s locker may reflect internal dissent in a west suburban fire department as work rule changes are pushed through.
A noose is widely known as a symbol of hatred, especially against African Americans for whom lynching was a disturbing reality for many years. Now a noose has taken center stage in a union dispute between white firefighters in west suburban Westchester, where work rule reforms are causing deep divisions between employees.
The troubles date back to September, when a white firefighter discovered a rope fashioned like a noose hanging inside his locker at the Westchester Fire Department, according to police reports and other documents recently obtained by the Better Government Association through the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.
Village officials do not believe the rope was intentionally formed and hung as a noose.
But the firefighter, Matthew Martin, felt he was being threatened and said there had been “tension amongst members of the fireman’s union,” according to a police report.
Martin, who at the time was president of the union that represents Westchester firefighters, had been at the center of controversy within the department because he helped pass policy changes that did not sit well with some members of the rank-and-file. As part of a deal in which the village agreed not to contract out fire department services to a private company, the firefighters’ union voted and approved a couple of contract revisions, including lowering the allowable blood-alcohol content for on-duty firefighters from 0.05 to 0.021. The legal limit for driving after consuming alcohol is 0.08.
The BGA uncovered, in a series of reports from 2013, that many police and fire departments allow [employees] to work with significant amounts of alcohol in their systems. Westchester, a small suburb on the west end of Cook County, was featured in one of the reports because the village board approved a union agreement that permitted police officers to work with a blood-alcohol level of up to 0.05, despite opposition from Mayor Sam Pulia.
Since then, Village Manager Janet Matthys said the administration has been negotiating to lower the allowable blood-alcohol levels in all of the village’s union contracts but so far has only been successful with the firefighters.
A major point of contention among firefighters, however, came with a change in rules about working second jobs at other fire departments. Beginning in 2015, firefighters are no longer allowed to perform firefighting and emergency medical services for another employer.
“We had a handful of guys that had to give up their secondary employment,” Matthys said. “They got very upset with the union board, especially with the president, that their views were not being represented.” Two factions formed within the union and a lot of infighting ensued, Matthys said. (There are 28 firefighters in the department; 24 are union members.)
It was around this time when the noose-like rope appeared in Martin’s locker.
After police began investigating the incident, someone from the fire department came forward and said he had found the rope on the ground, picked it up and hung it on the nearest hook to prevent a tripping hazard, according to documents and interviews.
“The fire chief explained to me that they do rope maneuvers all the time. So I said, ‘OK, I think we’re done here,’” said Westchester Police Chief John M. Carpino. “It’s a shame that it had to get to that point where someone thought their life was in danger” he added. “I think it was a lot about nothing.”
Martin said, “As president of the firefighters’ union, I was just trying to support our firefighters with this [contractual] language and support the community, the residents of Westchester, and subsequently I was personally attacked and ridiculed for it.” He referred all other questions from a reporter to the village.
In an email to Fire Chief James Adams, Martin said that there had been a series of “personal attacks against certain union exec board members” and that he was “not satisfied” with the village’s conclusion about the rope. He has since resigned from his position as union president but remains a firefighter.
In light of all the discord, the village board hired a consulting firm in recent months for roughly $28,000 to audit the fire department and study everything from finances to personnel management to response times. A draft is expected by the end of May.
The average salary for Westchester firefighters in 2014 was about $80,000 a year, records show. Most of the firefighters are cross-trained as paramedics.
#1 by Operator 57 on May 26, 2015 - 9:03 PM
In Illinois if you are injured you go on workmans comp. you recieve basically 66% of the total of what both jobs pay combined. It is the perogitive of any employer to make a work rule forbidding out side work in the same industry ie; Conflict of interest clause. If some town or entity whose tax base can only afford a part time department than so be it , it is up to each individual if they want to risk there full time benefits and pension against some part time work wages. But all this infighting & back biting will only hasten the contracting out of westchesters fire and rescue services. I can’t wait until security contract companies figure out a way to contract out police services to cities and towns.
#2 by 0.03 on May 26, 2015 - 12:30 PM
Jay I don’t ever recall any local having to justify wages, benefits or working conditions as firefighters against what carpenters, plumbers and other trades. We are hurting ourselves by willingly working for less wages, no benefits and usually lesser working conditions, all well allowing towns to not have to hire full time firefighters because some full timer is devaluing their job.
#3 by Crabby Milton on May 26, 2015 - 6:44 AM
This sort of behavior on the part of public and private sector union has no place. You almost have to expect this sort of crap from the labor unions as the history is long and sorted not to mention childish. But now this?
Some people need to grow up and accept the terms of a deal.
#4 by K O'D on May 25, 2015 - 10:33 PM
Look up scab in the dictionary. It’s got nothing to do with working for a non-union shop. It’s crossing a picket line !!!!
#5 by jay on May 25, 2015 - 8:57 PM
here we go with the scab bit again but lets not say anything about the guys who do electric, plumbing etc. on the side like they are not the biggest scabs.
#6 by 0.03 on May 25, 2015 - 8:21 PM
maybe the guys that think it’s ok to scab on their days off need to be reeducated so they understand that westchesters residents are the ones paying their salaries, benefits and pensions. So for them to got and work for less at another town and expose themselves to more risk of injury or death is irresponsible. Good for Matt to put an end to this and it’s pretty sad that the employer came up with some sh!t excuse supporting this type of harassment and intimidation. Besides if they were that upset about this then they shouldn’t have voted to ratify this contract.