Excerpts from an ACB7Chicago.com article about the Village of Matteson:
Some full-time police and firefighters in Matteson could be let go because of budget problems in the south suburb. The Village of Matteson sent letters to the police and fire unions this week, according to the village administrator. He says the village is facing budget constraints and hopes to open up negotiations with the police and fire unions.The police union reports that 13 police officers and 8 firefighters could be cut by mid-February.
“I don’t want to say it’s a chopping block because we look at the life of these firefighters, police officers, their families, it’s very critical to them for their jobs. It’s also critical for our residents to know that safety is there when they call, that when they call 911, that they know someone is going to be responding,” said Brian Mitchell, Matteson village administrator.
The police union had this response, in part: “The union is disheartened regarding this drastic step as it directly impacts the safety of the residents, members of the business community and officers on the street.” The village administrator says those unions do have a chance to respond to the letter by Tuesday.
Residents can speak out at a board meeting scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Monday.
Excerpts from the SouthtownStar.com from Friday:
An $8 million budget deficit in Matteson has led village officials to impose layoffs of police and firefighters, village administrator Brian Mitchell said Friday. The village intends to eliminate eight firefighters/paramedic positions to save $1.5 million and remove 13 police officers to save $1.2 million. Mitchell said the proposed layoffs were mindful of the need for safety in the community, stressing that the “goal is to make sure the community is still safe and secure.”
The layoffs would cut about half of the town’s 28-person police patrol, said Ray Violetto, the Metropolitan Alliance of Police representative for the Matteson officers. Violetto said he understands that the village has a deficit but it doesn’t make sense that firefighters and police officers are the only ones losing their jobs. “I’ve only seen cuts in emergency response personnel, but I don’t know of cuts in public works, administration or other departments,” he said.
The fire department would lose a quarter of its 32 union members, according to Scott Gilliam, president of the Associated Firefighters of Matteson. Gilliam insisted that Matteson “cannot possibly operate” with eight fewer firefighters, which would create a “severe threat to the safety and lives of both the firefighters and the citizens of this community.” “There’s no way we can operate below what we’re doing now,” he said, noting that the firefighters’ contract with the village requires a minimum of eight firefighters to be on duty per day. Forcing the remaining firefighters to maintain that daily minimum would require them to work “a lot of overtime” past their 60-hour work week, putting everyone’s health and safety at risk, Gilliam said.
The village administration sent letters to the police and fire unions, informing them of and asking for a response by Tuesday, Mitchell said, citing collective bargaining agreements that give the unions the “ability for critical input.”
Mitchell said several residents have called the village hall, asking to discuss the layoff issue at the meeting. He said the layoffs are not on the agenda because the village administration first wants to get the unions’ official response to the plan, but residents can comment and ask questions as usual.
thanks Dan
#1 by FDFC on January 29, 2015 - 7:18 AM
This is a situation created entirely by the mayor and the village board. They have been wasting money like crazy over the last half decade. Did you know the board voted to give themselves $4k raises each? They built a multi million dollar recreation center they didn’t need. They just made a bunch of political hires in admin and public works before announcing these lay offs. I’m sorry but this is nothing but lazy uneducated people getting voted in as a politicians to suck of the tax tit of society, instead of working a real job like the rest of us. We need legislation against elected official being paid a cent. We wouldn’t have nearly any of the problems we have now in this state.
Pingback: Layoffs may come to Matteson (more) | chicagoareafire.com
#2 by DMc77 on January 27, 2015 - 3:11 PM
Bullseye your comments couldn’t be farther from reality. Please show me where any fire or police departments have all this excess manpower and equipement just sitting around these days. Fire departments running with three man engine companies and no truck/squad companies threaten not only the safety of those they are sworn to protect, but the firefighters themselves. Want to see someone with balls? How about a fire chief that has to let a house burn down because he doesn’t have the resources immediately availible to him to properly and safely deal with the situation. Consolidation? How about one fire station for every 3-4 towns. That way you can save the most money and each town only has to kick in a few bucks for fire protection. No more pension obligations, no more burdensome payrolls to have to fund each year. Oh, and little to no fireman to help out when your house catches fire. They all got laid off…….
#3 by Bullseye on January 27, 2015 - 12:35 PM
Its about time someone had the balls to make budget cuts that are long over due (local government has to get smarter by taking a harder look and eventually red penning projects that do not add value to tax payer.
Local villages should look to working together to solve these problem of over capacity in the local government, to many villages paddle their own boats for self satisfaction with little regard for the next village/ local council.
When you can no longer afford what you have you have to work out how you can use equipment across all the villages far more wisely and prudently…Its disappointing and its tough to loose people but its a fact; Iron clad jobs just like in the private sector have gone regardless of unions or not.
Resources/equipment sitting in fire and police stations doing nothing, government buildings empty all of which cost money to run and then add in all the layers of government bureaucracy which clogs up getting anything done.
Albeit painful – Start to think about the issue differently – Functionalize, Consolidate and move forwards.
#4 by Big Papa on January 25, 2015 - 7:57 PM
Hey Mike, you are right on with your comment but you are wrong about Lake Zurich. The 800 extra runs they did last year were all to the Village of Barrington and not the Barrington Countryside Fire Protection District. There are times when both Lake Zurich and Barrington Countryside are in the Village of Barrington. Also, there are times that both Lake Zurich Station 2 and Station 4 are in the Village of Barrington. I wonder how long that will continue?
#5 by Tom Foley on January 25, 2015 - 4:04 PM
I’ve been a long time advocate of this same thing. Stop taxing another town’s resources (firefighters and/or equipment) when you can’t return the favor. It’s no longer “mutual”… the who point of mutual aid.
Throw in change of quarters and in a perfect storm situation, fire protection will be spread very thin.
The real problem is that salaries and benefits in local (and even state governments) are getting to a point where the model simply isn’t sustainable. Very few village boards want to go up against having to cut emergency staff. It’s a last resort. I would argue most police and fire staff are worth every penny they earn and then some, but you can’t pay more than you take in. Simply business.
Are some villages poorly run to where they caused or made situations worse? Sure. It happens.
I predict in the Chicago area you’ll continue to see village departments phased out in favor of fire districts and/or other types of consolidation. I could go on about the pros and cons of this, too… maybe another post…
It sucks for everyone involved. Again, I think very few village boards want to make a decision regarding cutting first responders. That’s a difficult place to be. Likewise, any first responder who’s affected… obviously it sucks.
There aren’t many winners… maybe to the taxpayer who can celebrate a balanced budget. But at what ultimate cost…?
#6 by m summa on January 25, 2015 - 2:02 PM
Chicago Ridge is another example of this. You listen to their calls. This department needs help from neighboring towns for any call that comes in. I wonder too, if the residents of these neighboring town know their tax dollar is helping another towns mismanagement.
#7 by Mike on January 25, 2015 - 12:30 PM
Until a fire chief or mayor or someone who has a say says no we will not supplement your town because of your layoffs this moochuial aid will continue. A perfect example is lake Zurich went into Barrington and Barrington countryside over 800 times in 2014 because neither department is really manned adequately.
#8 by Grumpy grizzly on January 25, 2015 - 11:30 AM
And the village will rely on mutual aid to fill in the gaps. Mutual aid was designed to provide help in situations that exceed the abilities of the department. Why should the apparatus of an adjacent town, paid for and supported by their tax dollars be used because of budget cuts? That is just wrong!