Politics Early & Often has an article on the city’s approval of the new CFD contract:
Chicago will get a dramatic upgrade in ambulance care — and firefighters will get $32 million in back pay — under a five-year contract approved Wednesday that opens the door to even higher pay raises.
The agreement ratified by the City Council guarantees 4,645 firefighters, paramedics and emergency medical technicians an 11 percent pay raise over five years, but ends free health care for those who retire between the ages of 55 and 65. After Dec. 31, those retirees will be forced to contribute 2 percent of their annuities toward the cost of their health insurance until they’re eligible for Medicare.
The pre-Medicare fee for retiree health care was one of the only givebacks Mayor Rahm Emanuel was able to wring out of Local 2. The mayor came up empty on his laundry list that took aim at treasured union perks such as holiday and duty-availability pay; clothing allowance; pay grades; premium pay; non-duty lay-up coverage; the physical fitness incentive; and the 7-percent premium paid to cross-trained firefighter-paramedics. Nor did the union agree to Emanuel’s plan to have “double houses” — stations with both engines and trucks — to be staffed by nine firefighters instead of 10.
All 15 of Chicago’s basic-life-support ambulances will be converted to advanced-life-support, giving Chicago 75 ambulances capable of administering the most sophisticated level of care. The decision to end a two-tiered emergency medical system that paramedics have called a dismal failure follows investigations by Inspector General Joe Ferguson, WBBM-TV and the Better Government Association. All three concluded Chicago needs more advanced-life-support ambulances to consistently meet response-time standards.The 15 basic-life-support ambulances are expected to be converted to advanced in September.
The 11-percent pay raise is only a “floor.” If the Illinois General Assembly mandates a pension contribution higher than the current 9.12 percent, the Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2 can negotiate an even bigger pay raise.
Workforce Development Committee Chairman Pat O’Connor (40th) has acknowledged that the contract’s $80 million pricetag is almost certain to rise “if the state [pension] law changes—and we anticipate that it would.” But he rose on the City Council floor to praise Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2 for coming to the bargaining table in good faith and avoiding the financial wildcard of interest arbitration, where the cost to Chicago taxpayers could have been even higher. O’Connor noted that it’s the first time in recent history that firefighters have settled their contract before Chicago Police officers.
The $32 million in back pay is already tucked away in the mayor’s 2014 budget and will not require additional borrowing. It must be paid within 75 days of next week’s final City Council vote.
thanks Dan
#1 by john on August 9, 2014 - 5:09 PM
Hey guys,
FYI, please don’t just reprint a newspaper article verbatim from the suntimes fran speilberg just for the sake of printing something as everything she writes is erroneous in some way or other. The health care 2% fee is not for members retiring between 55-65, but rather 55-60, as we have to retire by age 63, not 65. Age 60 and a day to age 63 does not have the 2% fee.
#2 by Dennis on August 7, 2014 - 7:50 AM
My guess on Ambulance relocation is this:
A80 to A85 will stay in their houses now.
A86 will go to E38
A87 will stay at E49
A88 will go to E88
A89 to A90 will stay at their houses now.
A91 will go to E121
A92 will go to E96
A93 & A94 will stay at their houses.
#3 by Dennis on August 7, 2014 - 7:44 AM
Bill Post, the scuttlebutt is this:
Amb 94 at E101 will stay and they will have 2 ALS ambos(A580
Amb. 93 at E42 will stay and they will have 2 ALS ambos(A42)
Starting Sept. 1st 5 BLS ambos will be taken OOS and they will be switched over to ALS (this includes cleaning the rig fully, stocking it with ALS supplies, renumbering to follow sequence and then get inspected by IDPH) This is supposed to take all of Sept with 5 BLS ambulances a week going to SLD. If a BLS company is closer to the call then a ALS company or a ambo then they will be dispatched along with the closet ALS company and the closet ambo. The same as we do now in most cases.
My side not is what will they do about AMB. 61 in the ” Chicago Fire” TV show you cant have an in service rig in the show…OMG!!!!!!!!
#4 by Bill Post on August 7, 2014 - 1:36 AM
It’s good to see that Chicago will continue running with 5 man Engines and Trucks. That was one of the issue’s that lead to the firefighters Strike of 1980.
It will also be interesting to see them restructure the Ambulance service one again and to see which Ambulances if any get relocated.
It is most likely that Ambulances 93 and 94 get relocated as they are both in double Ambulance houses. Perhaps a few more could be relocated as well.
Whether they do it or not , it would certainly make sense if Ambulances 80 through 94 get renumbered as Ambulances 61 through 75 and perhaps the ready reserve Ambulances could get renumbered as 80 or 90 series Ambulances. Even if the new ALS ambulances don’t get renumbered right away I wouldn’t be surprised if they were to get renumbered some time in the future.
I also wonder what new protocols they will be issued in regards to handling BLS calls or will they just go back to using the old protocols that they followed before June 15th 2000 when the BLS ambulance program was begun?
While quite a few of the larger cities such as New York and Los Angeles City fire department’s have been using a double tiered (ALS/BLS) ambulance system for quite a while there are some Fire Departments that still run with an all ALS fleet such as San Antonio , Dallas and Baltimore. Phoenix Arizona recently had changed over from being a BLS/ ALS system to an all ALS system.