Excerpts from the Daily Herald about another fire district seeking a tax increase.
Receiving fire protection and ambulance care will get more expensive in the Fox River and Countryside Fire/Rescue district service area if residents approve a tax increase on the April ballot.
District President Jim Gaffney confirmed Tuesday evening that trustees … approved a resolution to put a tax increase question before voters. Gaffney said district staff members are still crunching the numbers the tax increase would generate, but the money will fund salaries for emergency workers and a new fire engine. Gaffney said the first year of the proposed tax increase would add about $45 to the property tax bill of the owner of a $100,000 home. But that’s just in the first year. “… we’re going to do it on a step increase over five years. It will start at $45, and each year it will go up. We felt that was a fair way to do it.”
The first three years of the tax increase would fund salary increases and personnel costs for district staff. The fourth an fifth year of the increase would see the district sock away money to pay for equipment upgrades, including a new fire engine.
Gaffney said the retirement of some of the district’s bond debt in 2018 will offset a portion of the proposed tax increase, but he wasn’t ready to discuss exactly how much.
This district has a 38-mile coverage area. It spans parts of St. Charles, Campton and Wayne townships as well as parts of Kane and DuPage Counties. Sections of the villages of Wayne and Campton Hills fall within the district’s boundaries.
thanks Dan
Pingback: Fox River & Countryside Fire Rescue District … tough decisions | chicagoareafire.com
Pingback: Fox River & Countryside Fire/Rescue District loses bid for tax increase | chicagoareafire.com
#1 by Operator 57 on January 25, 2015 - 9:43 PM
Unfortunately nothing is free when you get into areas such as served by FRCFPD there are virtually no hydrants and few if any water sources so the closer your home or business is to the fire house & apparatus , the better the outcome for a incident and the lower your fire insurance costs but conversely it still will cost at some point.
#2 by John on January 25, 2015 - 8:51 AM
You get what you pay for, Hey tax payers you miss Saint Charles yet????
#3 by Mike on January 25, 2015 - 7:57 AM
Good thing this venture is supposed to save money for the taxpayers…oh wait, never mind. I guess the for profit private company needs to make more money. If only st. Charles could have provided better services for less money…..oh yeah, they could have done that too.
#4 by Sebastian on January 26, 2015 - 4:44 PM
Don’t get the whole st. Charles comment !!?
#5 by Mike on January 26, 2015 - 5:31 PM
It’s called sarcasm.