Excerpts from a Reporter Onlin article about the resignation of the Chicago Ridge fire chief:
The resignation last week of Chicago Ridge Fire Chief Robert Muszynski is the latest salvo in a heightening conflict between village officials and the fire department. Muszynski resigned citing personal difference with the village’s elected officials.
Mayor Chuck Tokar confirmed that he asked for Muszynski’s resignation. “Obviously, it’s a mayoral appointment. So I pretty much had to be the bearer of bad tidings and ask him to submit his resignation,” Tokar said Tuesday.
Firefighters are livid and are campaigning for Tokar to rehire Muszynski. Posts on the union’s Facebook page were critical of Tokar and the administration and is asking for Chicago Ridge residents to urge officials to bring him back.
“Call the village hall and tell your mayor and trustees to bring back Chief Muszynski. He was a great chief and person. He didn’t deserve to lose his job or forced to retire. He was great with the guys at the firehouse and loved by many residents. This is just not right,” one poster wrote.
“Total hypocrisy. It seems these ‘men’ are on the ‘do as we say, not as we do’ plan. Sounds like a certain mayor can’t play fair and honor the contracts, so pan his firemen off to another village. I’d love to see him go through the rigorous training and drills you all had to in order to get your firefighter and medic licenses and degrees, then do your jobs,” another poster commented.Muszynski, who took over as chief in early 2011, supported the hiring of an additional seven or eight firefighters/paramedics who would be based at the fire station at 107th Street and Lombard Avenue, Tokar said. That station currently is used for training and to store equipment, the mayor said. However, some residents have asked the village to consider having a second ambulance and possibility a fire truck at that station, which would reduce the response time to a large number of homes in the village.
The village’s main fire station is located in an industrial park and is not located near much of the village’s residential area. Tokar said the village cannot absorb the costs of staffing a second station.
Tokar, who was elected April, 2013, said he has explored “other options” for fire protection in the village, including obtaining services from a fire protection district or another community, such as Oak Lawn. Worth, which previously had its own fire department, signed a contract with the North Palos Fire Protection District a few years ago. Whatever decision the village makes, Tokar said he does not intend to “disband or dissolve” the fire department, which currently has 13 full-time firefighter/paramedics, the mayor said.
… Tokar was directed by trustees to “investigate and report to the board cost-saving measures that might save our taxpayers money while increasing the level of fire and ambulance service.” Dissolving the fire department and contracting with a private ambulance service are not under consideration, [according to a letter to residents from the village] The village’s letter also pointed out that village and the union are in the midst of contract negotiations and noted that none of the Chicago Ridge firefighters live in Chicago Ridge.
thanks Dan
#1 by 0.03 on July 7, 2014 - 9:41 PM
JC sounds like a scab that can’t pass the full time exam.
#2 by Jim on July 7, 2014 - 9:30 PM
JC,
Can you explain? If there are less employees paying into the fund, that money must be made up from the employer.
#3 by JC on July 7, 2014 - 3:36 PM
Bring in some contract medics that will save money, and the union can be phased out as they retire. That will get them out of their pension problems.
#4 by 0.03 on July 6, 2014 - 12:30 PM
The residency comment is BS. There are towns that are great to work for but either unaffordable to live or in some cases not safe to live in. The village is saying since they don’t live in town their voice doesn’t matter. Here is my thought on this. We actually do love in town at least 1/3 of the year, which also means spending our money in the village for at least 1/3 of the year.
#5 by Tom Foley on July 6, 2014 - 10:40 AM
Agree, Wayne. I’d love to know, too.
Perhaps not Chicago Ridge as much, but I think it’d be hard for some to live in communities like Hinsdale or Oak Brook on a FF salary.
We’re in a day where people travel as much as an hour or more to get to jobs, sometimes. If there are no call-backs, where a person lives isn’t relevant in my mind… provided they get to work on time.
#6 by cmk420 on July 6, 2014 - 10:37 AM
So, if the mayor is saying the dissolving the fire department & contracting with a private service aren’t options, then what are they considering? Auto-aid & mutual-aid agreements only go so far because what if the affected department needs help, and the department(s) that are supposed to help are already busy??
Come on mayor!! Figure out a way to support your fire department & give them the help they need. Get a jump company together for that second fire station so that village residents have the type of coverage they are asking for!
#7 by Wayne on July 5, 2014 - 11:50 PM
Can someone please explain the significance of where firefighters live as it relates to a full time department, especially one that has an extensive auto- and mutual- aid network like MABAS 21? It seems like it gets brought up all the time but if there are no call-backs then who cares?