On the eve of a dramatic upgrade in ambulance service, the Chicago Fire Department is making changes that, union leaders warn, could put the lives of paramedics and the public in danger.
Self-contained breathing apparatus are being removed from all 75 Chicago ambulances. In addition, roughly 70 paramedics graduating from the fire academy on Sunday will not be issued fire helmets, boots and protective clothing, known as bunker gear, that are standard issue for firefighters.
Without breathing masks and oxygen tanks, veteran paramedic Pat Fitzmaurice said paramedics will no longer be able to go into a burning high-rise–or subway after a derailment, collision or explosion–to rescue victims or firefighters in distress.
It also means that, instead of being right in front of a fire scene or in close proximity to a chemical spill, they may be staged a block away, Fitzmaurice said. That could add seconds and even minutes to the time it takes to rescue and treat victims.
The decision to strip paramedics of equipment specifically purchased for them was announced in an order signed Thursday by Deputy Fire Commissioner John McNicholas, who runs the Bureau of Operations.
“On Sept. 20, SCBA units will be removed from service on all ambulance units,” McNicholas wrote, spelling out the turn-in process without explaining why.
The Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2 has filed a grievance to protest changes that, the union contends, violate its contract with the city and put Chicagoans at risk at the worst possible time.
“With the real threat of terrorism worldwide at its highest level in years, Chicago is considered to be a prime terrorist possibility along with also being recognized as a city with multiple high-target hazards,” Ryan wrote Friday in a text message to the Chicago Sun-Times.
“The timing of this change in response protocol is suspect. As firefighters and paramedics serving a large city like Chicago, we need to be prepared for any and all emergencies…[and for] the worst-case scenario.”
Chicago Fire Department spokesman Larry Langford countered that Chicago was the “only major department in the nation” that outfitted “single-role” paramedics in fire gear and is simply “falling in line” with its counterparts.
“Single-role paramedics do not respond in burning structured or in hazardous location fires and they do not need the tanks or fire-resistant clothing,’ Langford wrote in an e-mail.
As for the bunker gear, Langford said new paramedics will be issued “more comfortable clothing better suited to EMS operation.” It will include a “traditional helmet,” waterproof utility boots and clothing tailor-made to “block transmission of patient body fluids.” Existing paramedics will keep their bunker gear until it needs to be replaced, he said.
“Single-role paramedics do not operate in a fire or hazardous situation. Patients are brought to them,” Langford said.
Mayoral spokesman Adam Collins added, “The city has deep respect for the men and women who protect residents and we will continue to ensure they have the equipment they need to help them do the job they were hired to do.”
Fitzmaurice argued that the changes make no sense at a time when fires are down and the overwhelming majority of 911 calls are for emergency medical service (EMS).
“If we don’t have self-contained breathing apparatus, we can’t be anywhere near a toxic environment. That means precious seconds are lost,” Fitzmaurice said.
“When victims come out of a fire, they’re wet. Some are not breathing. It’s a wild, rushed scene. Now, there won’t be a stretcher there. Paramedics will no longer be near fire scenes. If there’s a high-rise fire, they’ll no longer be in the lobby or evacuating the stairwell. If there’s an incident in the subway, you can’t send paramedics down there. They’ll be staged at a distant location. People can die.”
Fitzmaurice pointed to two recent incidents where firefighters went into cardiac arrest at fire scenes and were resuscitated by paramedics wearing breathing masks.
He also recalled an incident that occurred on Valentine’s Day, 2013. Ambulance 52 was returning to quarters from a run that ended at Loretto Hospital when civilians jumped in front of the ambulance in the 100-block of North Central.
A house was on fire and victims were trapped inside, paramedics were told. According to Fitzmaurice, the paramedics were then able to put on their helmets, protective clothing and breathing apparatus and go into the house to rescue someone who had gone in to search for a child.
The decision to strip paramedics of a breathing device they campaigned long and hard for—and that ambulances have special compartments to carry—comes as the Chicago Fire Department ends its 15-year experiment with a two-tier system of ambulance service.
Starting next week, all 15 basic-life-support ambulances will be converted to advanced-life-support, giving Chicago 75 ambulances capable of providing the most sophisticated level of care.
The decision to end a two-tier emergency medical system that paramedics have called a dismal failure follows investigations by Inspector General Joe Ferguson, WBBM-TV and the Better Government Association. All three concluded Chicago needs more advanced life support ambulances to consistently meet response time standards.
The newly-approved firefighters contract calls for the appointment of a six-member committee to study the need for even more ambulances.
And yet another study is under way to explore the possibility of relocating existing ambulances. That has Northwest Side aldermen fearful of losing ambulances campaigning against the change before a final decision has even been made.
thanks Scott
#1 by 0.03 on September 30, 2014 - 6:06 PM
Well here is an idea. Give the medics the old ensemble, long coat and hip boots. Personally the scba needs to be there because of the possibility of acts of terrorism. Why restrict the medics
#2 by Michael Douglass on September 30, 2014 - 5:18 PM
Ambulances respond to motor vehicle crashes, which responders at the scene should be wearing bunker gear at. Is the EMS PPE they are buying to replace the turnout gear rated to be used at MVC scenes??
#3 by Drew Smith on September 30, 2014 - 4:12 PM
This is not the first time CFD has stopped issuing single-role paramedics turnouts. There was a period of time where engineers weren’t required to have full turnouts and many opted for the full brim hard hat. While I would support turnouts there are other options for EMS PPE. However, the costs of one set of fire suppression PPE is closer to $2,000 (coat, pant, boots, helmet, hood, gloves) and EMS-type PPE will be 1/3 to 1/2 that amount.
Wake Forest NC has a county EMS service and issues it paramedics EMS PPE and an APR (full face “gas mask”) as well as other safety items and it seems to work for them.
#4 by Matthew G on September 30, 2014 - 3:29 PM
Thank you for the correction Bill. I had thought all of the engine companies had gone ALS
#5 by DaveyB on September 30, 2014 - 12:44 PM
Nads,WTF are you talking about? ffpm571 has a point. They are not splitting companies up when they do this, the company is assigned the task, turn the patient over to the medics, and get reassigned.
#6 by Bill Post on September 30, 2014 - 11:06 AM
For informational purposes .so far 59 of Chicago’s 96 “Land based” Engine companies are officially ALS or Paramedic Engines and 12 of Chicago’s 61 Truck and Tower Ladder companies are designated as ALS companies.
#7 by JS on September 30, 2014 - 10:21 AM
Not a good decision…at least keep the SCBA. If a medic uses it just once in their career, it was worth having. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it. Makes about as much sense as someone going back to the old standard of having a smoke detector on each level of the home vs. one in each bedroom “to save money” and because “I’ve never had a fire in my house.” Last I checked, we as emergency responders are supposed to be prepared for the worst possible scenario. Anything less than that is doing a disservice to ourselves and the public.
#8 by CFD 1979 on September 30, 2014 - 9:12 AM
Cutting costs looks great and saves substantial money, until someone gets hurt.
#9 by spoung46 on September 30, 2014 - 7:35 AM
What it comes down to is money, outfitting all the ALS ambulances (don’t know if the former BLS ones we equipped with bunker gear since most of them were FF EMT’S) with the timing of this happening at the same time of the new ALS ambulances going in to service makes me think this is about cutting costs. Say a full set of bunker gear is about 1100 dollars for 120 new medics (for the 15 new ambos) that’s 120,000 dollars. I could be wrong on this but its just my thoughts on this.
#10 by Matthew G on September 30, 2014 - 7:09 AM
I believe FFPM571 is aware of that. His point is that the paramedics that are on CFD’s ambulances are just that: single-role paramedics. The majority of them are not firefighters and they aren’t a “jump company” like in the suburbs that will cross to the engine or truck and become a suppression company at a fire. The vast majority or all of CFD’s Engine companies are ALS and some of the truck companies are as well leaving plenty of manpower to provide rescue.
#11 by nads on September 29, 2014 - 11:18 PM
FFPM571….the issue with utilizing crosstrained personnel in an EMS role during suppression operations is multifold. First of all, this splits up companies and creates an accountability nightmare not only for individual company officers, but chief officers as well. Secondly, this splitting of companies can hamper/inhibit suppression and rescue efforts. CFD has very specific SOGs and tactics which rely fairly heavily on having their 4 or 5 man companies. If you start to take 1 or 2 guys from each company (20% of that company) it can AND DOES severely impact that company’s ability to function appropriately.
#12 by ffpm571 on September 29, 2014 - 9:35 PM
CFD Medics are not suppression personnel. Their job is not to fight fire or mitigate a Haz-mat why should they have SCBA? CFD has plenty of cross trained Firefighter /Paramedics to do any kind of rescue requiring EMS care.
#13 by CFD 1979 on September 29, 2014 - 9:10 PM
Won’t last long, the union is already beginning the lawsuit process.
#14 by Jason on September 29, 2014 - 8:18 PM
Thats just wrong. Putting the medics and Chicago residents at risk.
#15 by JOHN FIER on September 29, 2014 - 5:19 PM
Sounds like a bunch of shit to me. In my 36 years of EMS in Chicago turnout gear was a must. Too many times the gear allowed us rapid onsite access to our patients, regardless if they were civilians or firefighters. This is a CATASTROPHIC mistake. DC McNicholas and all other command lackys should be ashamed. Let’s wait for the first one to die. Mr. Napoleon, Mayor that is, hope your house doesn’t burn, the closest Medic may be blocks away….3 3 5……………..